[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090604213033.GZ9285@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:30:33 -0700
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, xemul@...allels.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] exec_path 1/9: introduce ->exec_path and switch
/proc/*/exe
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:07:23AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Matt Helsley wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't this pin the vfs mount of the executable for the lifetime of
> > the task?
>
> Well, yes, but so does the current code.
Not quite. The current code pins it as long as the corresponding VMAs
are mapped -- not for the lifetime of the task.
> Sure, in _theory_ it can be a non-mmap executable (maybe people still have
> those old OMAGIC a.out executables), and in _theory_ you could unmap the
> executable even if it was originally mmap'ed, but neither of those is
> exactly common, are they?
Not common to my knowledge, no.
>
> So in practice, nothing has changed wrt lifetime of the executable.
Almost all of the time, yes.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists