[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A28539B.5050200@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:07:07 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
Luck Tony <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kmap_types: convert most arches to a single header
file
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 04 June 2009, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>> Subject: kmap_types: make most arches use generic header file
>>
>> Convert most arches (*except frv*) to use asm-generic/kmap_types.h.
>> Each arch still has its own kmap_types.h for customization if
>> needed (like frv).
>>
>> KM_FENCE is now controlled by CONFIG_HIGHMEM.
>>
>> Built on x86_64, i386, mips, sparc32, sparc64,
>> alpha, powerpc64, ia64, and m68k.
>>
>> Note: Removed KM_PTE2 from generic kmap_types.h file; it was defined
>> but not used by avr32.
>
> Every change in here looks good to me now, so
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Two questions though:
>
> 1. The patch still conflicts with mine from the asm-generic
> tree. Yours is better in multiple ways (cleans up all the
> archs, adds the necessary types for ppc and arm), so should
> I drop mine now? I guess I can also make my file identical
> to yours so independent of who gets in first, there should be
> a clean merge?
or you can take my patch into your asm-generic patchset. :)
> 2. should the asm and powerpc bits go through the arch maintainer
arm
> trees? I guess since they are slightly more than an obvious
> consolidation, at least an Ack from BenH and Russell would be
> appropriate.
Sure, acks from lots of arch maintainers would be Good,
esp. BenH and Russell.
--
~Randy
LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists