[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906050651.n556p7Vo094549@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:51:07 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
andreas.herrmann3@....com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [2.6.30-rc8] gcc 3.3 : __udivdi3 undefined.
Andrew Morton wrote:
> We could do the obvious:
>
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c~a
> +++ a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <linux/pfn.h>
>
> #include <asm/e820.h>
> +#include <asm/div64.h>
>
> static u64 patterns[] __initdata = {
> 0,
> @@ -48,7 +49,8 @@ static void __init memtest(u64 pattern,
>
> incr = sizeof(pattern);
> start_phys_aligned = ALIGN(start_phys, incr);
> - count = (size - (start_phys_aligned - start_phys))/incr;
> + count = size - (start_phys_aligned - start_phys);
> + do_div(count, incr);
> start = __va(start_phys_aligned);
> start_bad = 0;
> last_bad = 0;
"make" of "make allmodconfig" + CONFIG_KVM=n on gcc 3.3.5 completed
successfully.
>but I wonder why all those things are u64. They all hold virtual
>addresses, don't they? The code doesn't test highmem. So shouldn't
>these all be unsigned longs?
memtest() in linux-2.6.29.4/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c is using "unsigned long".
2.6.30 changed to use "u64" by some reason.
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists