linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] net: add NL802154 interface for configuration of 802.15.4 devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090605071529.GA7064@doriath.ww600.siemens.net>
Date:	Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:15:29 +0400
From:	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, slapin@...fans.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] net: add NL802154 interface for configuration of
	802.15.4 devices

On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:52:17AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 06:29 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> 
> > +/* This source file is shared between kernel and userspace sources, thus
> > + * a bit of __KERNEL__ checks
> > + */
> > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> 
> It's a C file. It can't be shared expect by copying, hence IMO these
> things are pointless.

It is shared by copying. And I'd strongly prefer to have it shared
directly by 'cp', not by 'cp' and 'patch'. E.g. currently I can ensure
that policy definitions and commands are current just by comparing
files. I'd like to still have that ability. Thus, I'd ask to permit this
stuff in.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/