[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830906050302v70c54e7cu89a52d57f9fe72e6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 03:02:46 -0700
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CPU hard limits
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Balbir Singh<balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> What about applications running as root, that can create their own
> groups? How about multiple instances of the same application started?
> Do applications need to know that creating a group will hurt
> guarantees provided to others?
Yes, of course. If you're handing out guarantees, but other users
can/will create cgroups with whatever parameters they like and won't
respect the guarantees that you've made, then those guarantees are
worthless. How do hard limits help in that situation?
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists