[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A28FC8F.5020802@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:07:59 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Denis Karpov <ext-denis.2.karpov@...ia.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] FS: userspace notification of errors
Kay Sievers wrote:
> And I don't think we want several event sources for the same thing,
> uevents _and_ pollable sysfs files.
>
> We already raise events on /proc/self/mountinfo when the mount tree
> changes, I guess that's where fs specific stuff belongs, and it will
> work with all kind of filesystem setups, regardless of the devices
> below it. This is also the established interface for flags and options
> and the current state of the filesystem, and does not mix filesystem
> options into block device interfaces.
>
> /proc/self/mountinfo could also work properly with namespaces which
> might have different meaning for a device in a different namespace.
Well, Denis suggests /sys/fs instead. But how would we pass stuff like
error code via /proc/self/mountinfo? And what if later some one wants
to provide user-space stuff like bogus inode number? IMO, /sys/fs
sounds better.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists