linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #13375] Kernel crash with 2.6.29 + nfs + xfs (radix-tree)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906051115580.16086@router.windsormachine.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:19:06 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Mike Dresser <mdresser_l@...ter.windsormachine.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Alex Samad <alex@...ad.com.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13375] Kernel crash with 2.6.29 + nfs + xfs (radix-tree)

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> I haven't actually measured it, but it shouldn't be that bad.  Mostly

I've enabled that as of yesterday and I'll let it go through it's normal 
operations.. It did survive the other night without CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG 
on(and on 2.6.30-rc8), but that sometimes happened anyways.

If it makes it through this weekend without crashing then that bodes well 
for something being fixed in the recent rc's.

Doesn't seem to be any slower though, the backups completed around the 
same time as they always do.

Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/