[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906050848520.6847@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>, xemul@...allels.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] exec_path 1/9: introduce ->exec_path and switch
/proc/*/exe
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> This mapping issue is what created VM_EXECUTABLE/MAP_EXECUTABLE in
> the first place, I assume? Never mind it's cheap hack.
>
> > and goes along with task->mm, and should be there, not in task_struct.
>
> Because ->mm can be borrowed to unrelated task and user has to check
> for it.
Not it can't.
You're confusing ->mm with ->active_mm.
The latter can be borrowed. The former can not.
The fact is, the executable is _inherently_ tied to the mm. It's what it
is mapped into. It makes no sense to tie it to anything else. It's simply
fundamentally not a "per-thread" thing.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists