linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] exec_path 1/9: introduce ->exec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906050942450.6847@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>, xemul@...allels.com,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] exec_path 1/9: introduce ->exec_path and switch
 /proc/*/exe

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> 
> It's borrowed by kernel thread of course, not userspace task.

.. and even if it is, what's the problem? 

That kernel thread has borroed whe VM for a while. It effectively _is_ a 
thread of the process now. So it's technically not even wrong to 
explicitly allow things like /proc/*/exe to see it as such.

But you can hide it by just checking some flag in the thread structure if 
you really want to.

But when creating a regular thread, you should _not_ need to take a 
spinlock and duplicate the executable path!

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/