[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ada63fawq7y.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:22:09 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: lkml@...eThan.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Compile Warning] 2.6.30-rc8 build
> To my reading of the function, I think gcc has a point:
>
> drivers/serial/8250.c: In function 'serial8250_shutdown':
> drivers/serial/8250.c:1685: warning: 'i' may be used uninitialized in this function
>
> It does read as if the code might try to initialize
> the 'lock' field of a null pointer.
The code in question is:
static void serial_unlink_irq_chain(struct uart_8250_port *up)
{
struct irq_info *i;
struct hlist_node *n;
struct hlist_head *h;
mutex_lock(&hash_mutex);
h = &irq_lists[up->port.irq % NR_IRQ_HASH];
hlist_for_each(n, h) {
i = hlist_entry(n, struct irq_info, node);
if (i->irq == up->port.irq)
break;
}
BUG_ON(n == NULL);
BUG_ON(i->head == NULL);
if (list_empty(i->head))
free_irq(up->port.irq, i);
and if the hlist_for_each() doesn't find a matching irq_info to put in
i, then the BUG_ON(n == NULL) will kill the system. So there's no bug
although it is understandable that gcc can't see that.
(Not sure why you talk about "the 'lock' field of a null pointer" -- I
assume your gcc warns about the function serial8250_shutdown() because
it is inlining a function only called from a single location)
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists