lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:41:32 -0700
From:	Greg KH <>
To:	Pranith Kumar <>
Subject: Re: Are patches for warnings in drivers/staging/* worth?

On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:34:22AM +0530, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> I am looking at the various warnings which occur while compiling the 
> staging drivers. Most of them are
> * unused variables
> * arg makes pointer from integer without cast
> * un-initialized variable
> What in these warnings should I send patches against? Are they worth the 
> effort?

Sure they are worth the effort in cleaning up this kind of things.
Always generate patches for the staging tree against the latest
linux-next release.


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists