linux-kernel - Re: Are patches for warnings in drivers/staging/* worth?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:41:32 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Pranith Kumar <pranith.hacks@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Are patches for warnings in drivers/staging/* worth?

On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:34:22AM +0530, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> I am looking at the various warnings which occur while compiling the 
> staging drivers. Most of them are
> 
> * unused variables
> * arg makes pointer from integer without cast
> * un-initialized variable
> 
> What in these warnings should I send patches against? Are they worth the 
> effort?

Sure they are worth the effort in cleaning up this kind of things.
Always generate patches for the staging tree against the latest
linux-next release.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/