[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906051249.25053.lkml@morethan.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:49:22 -0500
From: "Michael S. Zick" <lkml@...ethan.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Compile Warning] 2.6.30-rc8 build
On Fri June 5 2009, Roland Dreier wrote:
>
> > I can't argue with gcc on this one either:
> >
> > drivers/scsi/sd.c: In function 'sd_read_capacity':
> > drivers/scsi/sd.c:1451: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
> >
> > It reads to my eyes as if the function can never
> > select read_capacity_16 for very large devices.
>
> The code is:
>
> if ((sizeof(sdkp->capacity) > 4) &&
> (sdkp->capacity > 0xffffffffULL)) {
>
> sdkp->capacity is a sector_t, and <linux/types.h> has:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LBD
> typedef u64 sector_t;
> typedef u64 blkcnt_t;
> #else
> typedef unsigned long sector_t;
> typedef unsigned long blkcnt_t;
> #endif
>
> so if you don't set CONFIG_LBD on a 32-bit architecture, then you are
> correct that sd.c won't ever hit the READ_CAPACITY(16) case, and the
> kernel won't be able to handle large SCSI disks.
>
>
Perhaps then let gcc coherce the test value into a local sector_t holder
to make the warning go away (it would still be protected by the >4 thing).
Not a problem here - NetBooks don't (yet) come with that big a disk. ;)
Thanks
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists