linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/proc.c adding extended_cpuid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:50:06 +0530
From:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/proc.c adding extended_cpuid_level for
 /proc/cpuinfo

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:40 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>>
> >> why we need cpuid_level ?
> > 
> > It is already visible in userspace. I think you've got an answer to a
> > very similar question already:
> > 
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124206571628464
> > 
> 
> extended_cpuid_level should be motivated, but probably does make sense.
>  It hardly "completes" /proc/cpuinfo; especially if you consider that
> there are at least three additional ranges in wide use (two used by a
> single vendor only, and the third by virtualization software.)
> 

So how can we complete it.

--
JSR

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/