lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:06:41 +0100 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: lkml@...ethan.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Compile Warning] 2.6.30-rc8 build > I don't think there's any way in which gcc can deduce that h->first is > non-zero on entry to that loop. Even if it inlines > serial_unlink_irq_chain() into serial8250_shutdown(). Why does it care ? Suppose the list is empty, n is loaded with NULL That follows the BUG_ON path which expands to include a function marked as not returning gcc is just rather smarter than your average cc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists