lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:49:50 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> To: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org> Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, riel@...hat.com, hugh@...itas.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] - support inheritance of mlocks across fork/exec V2 > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:04 -0500, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > > > Add support for mlockall(MCL_INHERIT|MCL_RECURSIVE): > > FWIW, I really liked this patch series. And I think there is still value > in a generic "mlock" wrapper utility that I can use. Sure, the later on > containers suggestions are all wonderful in theory but I don't see that > that went anywhere either (and I disagree that we can't trust people to > use this right without doing silly things) - if I'm really right that > this got dropped on the floor, can we resurrect it in .31 please? I guess Lee is really really busy now. Can you make V3 patch instead? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists