lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:54:26 +0200 From: "Anders K. Pedersen" <akp@...aesio.com> To: Dave McCracken <dcm@...r.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [benchmark] 1% performance overhead of paravirt_ops on native kernels Dave McCracken wrote: > What I see as the message of his benchmark is if you care about performance > you should be customizing your kernel anyway. Distro kernels are slow. An > option that makes the distro kernel a bit slower is no big deal since anyone > who wants speed should already be rebuilding their kernel. And Oracle of course supports customers doing that? Not in my experience, and the same goes for most other commercial enterprise software on Linux as well, so customers have to stick to distro kernels, if they want support. Regards, Anders K. Pedersen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists