[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090606080820.GA16867@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:08:20 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...well.aristanetworks.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] vfs: Implement unpoll_file.
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 02:50:27PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...well.aristanetworks.com>
>
> During a revoke operation it is necessary to stop using all state that is managed
> by the underlying file operations implementation. The poll wait queue is one part
> of that state.
Erm... Seeing that drivers and filesystems tend to have fsckloads of
other state of their own, why do we treat that separately?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists