[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906071504.13725.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 15:04:13 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ide-tape: fix flags
[ added Jiri to cc: ]
On Saturday 06 June 2009 19:58:36 Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 June 2009 09:05:06 Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > Hi Bart,
> > >
> > > those fix a stupid flags misuse that got spotted by Jiri Slaby. Please
> > > pay special attention to the first patch. FWIW, those can go as hot
> > > fixes right away and we might catch 30-rc8 since it's not out yet.
> >
> > The problem is that patches seem to be against ide-2.6.git/for-next...
>
> Sh*t, this is hitting the broken buffer allocation that Tejun removed
> (I'm getting the same OOM-kill as the one Tejun's mentioning here
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=124191711928890) so even with those
> patches, ide-tape is still broken.
>
> I'm guessing backport all of Tejun's ide-tape cleanup stuff after Linus
> pulls them into 31-rc1?
Seems so, though it may be too much work for too little gain
(we still have other open ide-tape issues like DMA related one).
In the meantime I applied your patches to for-next..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists