[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1244354850.3963.21.camel@dyn9002018117.watson.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 02:07:30 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] integrity: fix IMA inode leak
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 21:18 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> CONFIG_IMA=y inode activity leaks iint_cache and radix_tree_node objects
> until the system runs out of memory. Nowhere is calling ima_inode_free()
> a.k.a. ima_iint_delete(). Fix that by calling it from destroy_inode().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
This call was accidentally dropped in the conversion from
using the LIM hooks to embedding the IMA calls directly. I'm
really sorry.
Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> fs/inode.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> --- 2.6.30-rc8/fs/inode.c 2009-05-16 10:26:15.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/fs/inode.c 2009-06-06 17:41:21.000000000 +0100
> @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ static struct inode *alloc_inode(struct
> void destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
> {
> BUG_ON(inode_has_buffers(inode));
> + ima_inode_free(inode);
> security_inode_free(inode);
> if (inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode)
> inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode(inode);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists