linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix non-lazy GS handling in sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1244384628.2323.4.camel@bimbo>
Date:	Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:23:48 +0200
From:	Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix non-lazy GS handling in sys_vm86()

On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 09:56 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk> wrote:

> > -		"mov  %2, %%gs\n\t"
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32_LAZY_GS
> > +		"mov  $0, %%gs\n\t"
> > +#endif
> 
> That bit looks rather untested - i dont think there's an immediate 
> constant instruction variant for segment register moves ...

Right. Sorry, I only tested (dosbox & svgalib) with stackprotector
enabled. This time I ensured it compiles and runs dosbox & mode3 (from
svgalib) both with and without stackprotector:

>>From 8bdb7e27766be7bf2902cf6d6938f3e5868d0aac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 20:09:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix non-lazy GS handling in sys_vm86()

This fixes a stack corruption panic or null dereference oops due to
a bad GS in resume_userspace() when returning from sys_vm86() and calling
lockdep_sys_exit().

Only a problem when CONFIG_LOCKDEP and CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR enabled.
---
 arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c |    9 +++++----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
index d7ac84e..6a17769 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
@@ -287,10 +287,9 @@ static void do_sys_vm86(struct kernel_vm86_struct *info, struct task_struct *tsk
 	info->regs.pt.ds = 0;
 	info->regs.pt.es = 0;
 	info->regs.pt.fs = 0;
-
-/* we are clearing gs later just before "jmp resume_userspace",
- * because it is not saved/restored.
- */
+#ifndef CONFIG_X86_32_LAZY_GS
+	info->regs.pt.gs = 0;
+#endif
 
 /*
  * The flags register is also special: we cannot trust that the user
@@ -343,7 +342,9 @@ static void do_sys_vm86(struct kernel_vm86_struct *info, struct task_struct *tsk
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
 		"movl %0,%%esp\n\t"
 		"movl %1,%%ebp\n\t"
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32_LAZY_GS
 		"mov  %2, %%gs\n\t"
+#endif
 		"jmp resume_userspace"
 		: /* no outputs */
 		:"r" (&info->regs), "r" (task_thread_info(tsk)), "r" (0));
-- 
1.6.2.2

-- 
"Excuse all the blood" -- Dead

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/