lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A2C2CE5.4010909@tuxteam.com>
Date:	Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:11:01 -0400
From:	David Tomaschik <david@...team.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Kernel Slowdown without Swap Space?

It has frequently reported in a number of sources that running a Linux
system without any swap slows the kernel down.  While I understand that
the overall system may run better with swap (unused space can be swapped
out to allow more cache), is there any reason a significant performance
hit would be seen when running without swap?  I currently do so on my
netbook (to reduce write cycles to the SSD).  So is the "need" for swap
urban legend, or is there a good case for it, aside from caching
performance?

Thanks,
--DT


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (899 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ