[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090608112736.GL29447@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:27:36 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: cl@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
mingo@...e.hu, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx 04/11] Use this_cpu ops for network statistics
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 03:18:23PM -0400, cl@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
...
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h 2009-06-03 16:23:29.000000000 -0500
...
> #define NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, count) \
> -do { \
> - local_bh_disable(); \
> - per_cpu_ptr((net)->ct.stat, raw_smp_processor_id())->count++; \
> - local_bh_enable(); \
> -} while (0)
> + this_cpu_inc((net)->ct.stat->count)
Why not put this on one line?
#define NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, count) this_cpu_inc((net)->ct.stat->count)
obin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists