[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A2D1017.6010308@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:20:23 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Mel Gorman wrote:
> We've encountered this before and the conclusion was that the current
> adjustments for watermark calculations of high-order allocations is right,
> or at least there is no better alternative. In other words, the page
> allocator in this instance is behaving as expected. Do we want to
> revisit that discussion as to whether the watermark calculations for
> high-order allocation should change? I think we'll reach the same
> conclusion or at least decide that allowing the order-1 atomic
> allocation to succeed here would just postpone the problem.
It would not just postpone the problem, it would also
bring the system closer to a state where kswapd does
something about the order-1 free areas.
This might postpone the problem indefinately.
Currently the system fails early, without kswapd
kicking in and freeing new order-1 areas.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists