[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A2C8105.9030503@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:09:57 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4] x86: MCE: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU
ring buffer
Huang Ying wrote:
> Emm, it seem hard to analyze mce_log_cpu from per_cpu_var(mce_log_cpus),
> how about following method:
>
> struct mce_log {
> char signature[12];
> ...
> struct mce_log_cpu *mcelog_cpus[];
> };
>
> void mcelog_init(void)
> {
> int cpu;
> mcelog.mcelog_cpus = kmalloc(sizeof(void *) * num_possible_cpus();
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> mcelog.mcelog_cpus[cpu] = &per_cpu(mce_log_cpus, cpu);
> }
It would be good. Using kzalloc() will be better.
It might be a bit much, but how about adding:
+ mcelog.nr_mcelog_cpus = num_possible_cpus();
Be careful that mcheck_init(), caller of mcelog_init(), will be called
for each booted CPU. You will need:
+ if (mcelog.mcelog_cpus)
+ return;
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists