linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH mmotm] vmscan: fix may

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon,  8 Jun 2009 12:20:54 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] vmscan: fix may_swap handling for memcg

Hi

> From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
> 
> Commit 2e2e425989080cc534fc0fca154cae515f971cf5 ("vmscan,memcg: reintroduce
> sc->may_swap) add may_swap flag and handle it at get_scan_ratio().
> 
> But the result of get_scan_ratio() is ignored when priority == 0, and this
> means, when memcg hits the mem+swap limit, anon pages can be swapped
> just in vain. Especially when memcg causes oom by mem+swap limit,
> we can see many and many pages are swapped out.
> 
> Instead of not scanning anon lru completely when priority == 0, this patch adds
> a hook to handle may_swap flag in shrink_page_list() to avoid using useless swaps,
> and calls try_to_free_swap() if needed because it can reduce
> both mem.usage and memsw.usage if the page(SwapCache) is unused anymore.
> 
> Such unused-but-managed-under-memcg SwapCache can be made in some paths,
> for example trylock_page() failure in free_swap_cache().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>

I think root cause is following branch, right?
if so, Why can't we handle this issue on shrink_zone()?


---------------------------------------------------------------
static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
                                struct scan_control *sc)
{
        get_scan_ratio(zone, sc, percent);

        for_each_evictable_lru(l) {
                int file = is_file_lru(l);
                unsigned long scan;

                scan = zone_nr_pages(zone, sc, l);
                if (priority) {				// !!here!!
                        scan >>= priority;
                        scan = (scan * percent[file]) / 100;
                }




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/