[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090608143857.GG15070@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:38:57 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
yanmin.zhang@...el.com, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
linuxram@...ibm.com, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Reintroduce zone_reclaim_interval for when
zone_reclaim() scans and fails to avoid CPU spinning at 100% on NUMA
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:33:41AM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Yes, they're on separate LRU lists but they are not the only pages on those
> > lists. The tmpfs pages are mixed in together with anonymous pages so we
> > cannot use NR_*_ANON.
>
> The tmpfs pages are unreclaimable and therefore should not be on the anon
> lru.
>
tmpfs pages can be swap-backed so can be reclaimable. Regardless of what
list they are on, we still need to know how many of them there are if
this patch is to be avoided.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists