[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A2D25F6.9080300@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:53:42 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Security, resend] Instant crash with rtl8169 and large packets
Thank you Eric for the reply.
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Michael Tokarev a écrit :
[]
>> The situation is very simple: with an RTL8169 (probably
>> onboard) GigE card which, by default, is configured to
>> have MTU (maximal transmission unit) to be 1500 bytes,
>> it's *trivial* to instantly crash the machine by sending
>> it a *single* packet of size >1500 bytes (provided the
>> network switch can handle jumbo frames).
[]
>> http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/r8169-mtu-oops.jpg
> I suppose you use a recent kernel ?
http://marc.info/?t=123462473200002 -- here's my first attempt,
at Feb this year. It was 2.6.27 or so. Right now I'm running
2.6.29[.4]. So I think yes, I use a recent kernel.
> Could you please try following patch ?
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
> index e94316b..c08b97a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c
> @@ -3468,7 +3468,7 @@ static int rtl8169_rx_interrupt(struct net_device *dev,
>
> if (status & DescOwn)
> break;
> - if (unlikely(status & RxRES)) {
> + if (unlikely(status & (RxRES | RxRWT | RxRUNT | RxCRC | RxFOVF))) {
> if (netif_msg_rx_err(tp)) {
> printk(KERN_INFO
> "%s: Rx ERROR. status = %08x\n",
Tried that one, got no printk (at least not a visible one) and exactly
the same OOPS as before. Trivial test with
ping -c1 -s3000 $my_ip_addr
(learned to add -c1 because the previous time my machine crashed several times
in a row till I figured out what's going on and unplugged the ethernet cord --
even if ping were running from an xterm executed from the machine to which I
were pinging to! :)
Also got ext4fs corruption when rebooted (it's a staging area so nothing important
is there but still.. "interesting").
Also tried 32bit kernel (were using 64bits -- exactly the same result).
I wish I had a serial cable or even a serial port on this machine.... But I guess
it'd not help anyway, because the machine locks hard.
Thanks!
/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists