[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090608145816.GA17579@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:58:16 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Zick" <lkml@...ethan.org>
Cc: Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: Enable acpi-cpufreq driver for
VIA/Centaur CPUs
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 09:25:09AM -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> On Mon June 8 2009, Harald Welte wrote:
> > The VIA/Centaur C7, C7-M and Nano CPU's all support ACPI based cpu p-states
> > using a MSR interface. The Linux driver just never made use of it, since in
> > addition to the check for the EST flag it also checked if the vendor is Intel.
> >
>
> It looks like we should modify (conditional on ...MVIAC7 at build, model='d' runtime)
> the acpi-cpufreq controls to deal properly with the Model-D adaptive controller.
Can't make it build-time dependent - distribution kernels may not
explicitly support the C7. It's valid to have a vendor=centaur
conditional that turns off any adaptive control if appropriate ACPI
methods are present.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists