[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906081841580.7100@sister.anvils>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 18:44:48 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] latencytop: note task_struct bloat
Add belated comment to LATENCYTOP help text, making clear that this is a
much more expensive option than you might think: along with the options
it selects, it may add more than 4000 bytes to each struct task_struct
(on 64-bit; more than 2000 on 32-bit), effectively quadrupling the size
of an otherwise lean task_struct (in fact, slab on x86_64 fits only 1
in two pages, whereas it fits 5 in two pages without LATENCYTOP=y).
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- 2.6.30-rc8/lib/Kconfig.debug 2009-05-16 10:26:16.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/lib/Kconfig.debug 2009-06-08 18:30:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -826,6 +826,10 @@ config LATENCYTOP
Enable this option if you want to use the LatencyTOP tool
to find out which userspace is blocking on what kernel operations.
+ Note: enabling this option may add more than 4000 bytes to each
+ task_struct on a 64-bit kernel (more than 2000 bytes to task_struct
+ on a 32-bit kernel), multiplying its memory usage by 4 or even 5.
+
config SYSCTL_SYSCALL_CHECK
bool "Sysctl checks"
depends on SYSCTL_SYSCALL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists