linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/49] ext4: Fix and simplify s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1244488987-32564-10-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
Date:	Mon,  8 Jun 2009 15:22:27 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 09/49] ext4: Fix and simplify s_dirt handling

The s_dirt flag wasn't completely handled correctly, but it didn't
really matter when journalling was enabled.  It turns out that when
ext4 runs without a journal, we don't clear s_dirt in places where we
should have, with the result that the high-level write_super()
function was writing the superblock when it wasn't necessary.

So we fix this by making ext4_commit_super() clear the s_dirt flag,
and removing many of the other places where s_dirt is manipulated.
When journalling is enabled, the s_dirt flag might be left set more
often, but s_dirt really doesn't matter when journalling is enabled.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c |   14 +++-----------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index ad4c9be..7c7a08a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -3128,7 +3128,6 @@ static int ext4_load_journal(struct super_block *sb,
 	if (journal_devnum &&
 	    journal_devnum != le32_to_cpu(es->s_journal_dev)) {
 		es->s_journal_dev = cpu_to_le32(journal_devnum);
-		sb->s_dirt = 1;
 
 		/* Make sure we flush the recovery flag to disk. */
 		ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
@@ -3168,7 +3167,7 @@ static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb, int sync)
 					&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_freeblocks_counter));
 	es->s_free_inodes_count = cpu_to_le32(percpu_counter_sum_positive(
 					&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_freeinodes_counter));
-
+	sb->s_dirt = 0;
 	BUFFER_TRACE(sbh, "marking dirty");
 	mark_buffer_dirty(sbh);
 	if (sync) {
@@ -3210,7 +3209,6 @@ static void ext4_mark_recovery_complete(struct super_block *sb,
 	if (EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER) &&
 	    sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) {
 		EXT4_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER);
-		sb->s_dirt = 0;
 		ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
 	}
 	unlock_super(sb);
@@ -3271,10 +3269,8 @@ int ext4_force_commit(struct super_block *sb)
 		return 0;
 
 	journal = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal;
-	if (journal) {
-		sb->s_dirt = 0;
+	if (journal)
 		ret = ext4_journal_force_commit(journal);
-	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -3282,15 +3278,13 @@ int ext4_force_commit(struct super_block *sb)
 /*
  * Ext4 always journals updates to the superblock itself, so we don't
  * have to propagate any other updates to the superblock on disk at this
- * point.  (We can probably nuke this function altogether, and remove
- * any mention to sb->s_dirt in all of fs/ext4; eventual cleanup...)
+ * point if the journalling is enabled.
  */
 static void ext4_write_super(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal) {
 		if (mutex_trylock(&sb->s_lock) != 0)
 			BUG();
-		sb->s_dirt = 0;
 	} else {
 		ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
 	}
@@ -3302,7 +3296,6 @@ static int ext4_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
 	tid_t target;
 
 	trace_mark(ext4_sync_fs, "dev %s wait %d", sb->s_id, wait);
-	sb->s_dirt = 0;
 	if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal) {
 		if (jbd2_journal_start_commit(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal,
 					      &target)) {
@@ -3324,7 +3317,6 @@ static int ext4_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	int error = 0;
 	journal_t *journal;
-	sb->s_dirt = 0;
 
 	if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
 		journal = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal;
-- 
1.6.3.2.1.gb9f7d.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/