linux-kernel - [PATCH 27/49] ext4: Fix spinlock assertions on UP systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon,  8 Jun 2009 15:22:45 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Vincent Minet <vincent@...cent-minet.net>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 27/49] ext4: Fix spinlock assertions on UP systems

From: Vincent Minet <vincent@...cent-minet.net>

On UP systems without DEBUG_SPINLOCK, ext4_is_group_locked always fails
which triggers a BUG_ON() call.
This patch fixes it by using assert_spin_locked instead.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Minet <vincent@...cent-minet.net>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
 fs/ext4/ext4.h    |    6 ------
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c |   10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 149e02d..89190ae 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1583,12 +1583,6 @@ static inline void ext4_unlock_group(struct super_block *sb,
 	spin_unlock(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, group));
 }
 
-static inline int ext4_is_group_locked(struct super_block *sb,
-					ext4_group_t group)
-{
-	return spin_is_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, group));
-}
-
 /*
  * Inodes and files operations
  */
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index e76459c..541bd9a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static void mb_free_blocks_double(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
 
 	if (unlikely(e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap == NULL))
 		return;
-	BUG_ON(!ext4_is_group_locked(sb, e4b->bd_group));
+	assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, e4b->bd_group));
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
 		if (!mb_test_bit(first + i, e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap)) {
 			ext4_fsblk_t blocknr;
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static void mb_mark_used_double(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int first, int count)
 
 	if (unlikely(e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap == NULL))
 		return;
-	BUG_ON(!ext4_is_group_locked(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
+	assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
 		BUG_ON(mb_test_bit(first + i, e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap));
 		mb_set_bit(first + i, e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap);
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
 	struct super_block *sb = e4b->bd_sb;
 
 	BUG_ON(first + count > (sb->s_blocksize << 3));
-	BUG_ON(!ext4_is_group_locked(sb, e4b->bd_group));
+	assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, e4b->bd_group));
 	mb_check_buddy(e4b);
 	mb_free_blocks_double(inode, e4b, first, count);
 
@@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ static int mb_find_extent(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, int order, int block,
 	int ord;
 	void *buddy;
 
-	BUG_ON(!ext4_is_group_locked(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
+	assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
 	BUG_ON(ex == NULL);
 
 	buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, order, &max);
@@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ static int mb_mark_used(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct ext4_free_extent *ex)
 
 	BUG_ON(start + len > (e4b->bd_sb->s_blocksize << 3));
 	BUG_ON(e4b->bd_group != ex->fe_group);
-	BUG_ON(!ext4_is_group_locked(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
+	assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
 	mb_check_buddy(e4b);
 	mb_mark_used_double(e4b, start, len);
 
-- 
1.6.3.2.1.gb9f7d.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/