[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1244488987-32564-13-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:22:30 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 12/49] ext4: Remove outdated comment about lock_super()
ext4_fill_super() is no longer called by read_super(), and it is no
longer called with the superblock locked. The
unlock_super()/lock_super() is no longer present, so this comment is
entirely superfluous.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 8 --------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index fcd7b24..e3b35f2 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -2828,14 +2828,6 @@ no_journal:
goto failed_mount4;
};
- /*
- * akpm: core read_super() calls in here with the superblock locked.
- * That deadlocks, because orphan cleanup needs to lock the superblock
- * in numerous places. Here we just pop the lock - it's relatively
- * harmless, because we are now ready to accept write_super() requests,
- * and aviro says that's the only reason for hanging onto the
- * superblock lock.
- */
EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_state |= EXT4_ORPHAN_FS;
ext4_orphan_cleanup(sb, es);
EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_state &= ~EXT4_ORPHAN_FS;
--
1.6.3.2.1.gb9f7d.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists