[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906082156.50923.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 21:56:50 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide-tape: fix proc warning
On Sunday 07 June 2009 19:45:33 Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 03:28:04PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > because it tries to free its proc entry in drive_release_dev()
> > > in the call chain resulting from ide_tape_put() but it chokes on
> > > /proc/ide/ide[01]/hd?/name which is added during driver registration and
> > > should go only at driver removal time.
> > >
> > > Add/remove those proc entries everytime the device is accessed.
> >
> > This looks more like broken ide-tape refcounting for chrdev interface
> > than mismatch of /proc entries registration time (especially since other
> > device drivers are not having the above problem)..
>
> This sounds more like it, I was wondering why that
> /proc/ide/ide[01]/hd?/name attribute was disappearing.
>
> > Please see ide_tape_chrdev_get() -- it misses ide_device_get() call
> > [present in ide_tape_get()] which can result in premature release of
> > IDE device during ide_tape_put() call.
>
> By the way, why are we using two devs for the reference counting:
> drive->gendev over ide_device_get() and fall back to {tape,cd,idkp}->dev
> in get_device(). Isn't one enough?
->gendev and ->dev have different lifetime rules.
> Anyways, here's the fixed version, tested with my Seagate STT8000A,
> works fine.
>
> --
> From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
> Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:35:56 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ide-tape: fix proc warning
>
> ide_tape_chrdev_get() was missing an ide_device_get() refcount increment
> which lead to the following warning:
>
> [ 278.147906] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 278.152685] WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:847 remove_proc_entry+0x199/0x1b8()
> [ 278.160070] Hardware name: P4I45PE 1.00
> [ 278.160076] remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'ide0/hdb', leaking at least 'name'
> [ 278.160080] Modules linked in: rtc intel_agp pcspkr thermal processor thermal_sys parport_pc parport agpgart button
> [ 278.160100] Pid: 2312, comm: mt Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2 #3
> [ 278.160105] Call Trace:
> [ 278.160117] [<c012141d>] warn_slowpath+0x71/0xa0
> [ 278.160126] [<c035f219>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x29/0x2c
> [ 278.160132] [<c011c686>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x1b6/0x1c0
> [ 278.160141] [<c011c69b>] ? default_wake_function+0xb/0xd
> [ 278.160149] [<c0177ead>] ? pollwake+0x4a/0x55
> [ 278.160156] [<c035f240>] ? _spin_unlock+0x24/0x26
> [ 278.160163] [<c0165d38>] ? add_partial+0x44/0x49
> [ 278.160169] [<c01669e8>] ? __slab_free+0xba/0x29c
> [ 278.160177] [<c01a13d8>] ? sysfs_delete_inode+0x0/0x3c
> [ 278.160184] [<c019ca92>] remove_proc_entry+0x199/0x1b8
> [ 278.160191] [<c01a297e>] ? remove_dir+0x27/0x2e
> [ 278.160199] [<c025f3ab>] ide_proc_unregister_device+0x40/0x4c
> [ 278.160207] [<c02599cd>] drive_release_dev+0x14/0x47
> [ 278.160214] [<c0250538>] device_release+0x35/0x5a
> [ 278.160221] [<c01f8bed>] kobject_release+0x40/0x50
> [ 278.160226] [<c01f8bad>] ? kobject_release+0x0/0x50
> [ 278.160232] [<c01f96ac>] kref_put+0x3c/0x4a
> [ 278.160238] [<c01f8b29>] kobject_put+0x37/0x3c
> [ 278.160243] [<c025020c>] put_device+0xf/0x11
> [ 278.160249] [<c025789f>] ide_device_put+0x2d/0x30
> [ 278.160255] [<c02658da>] ide_tape_put+0x24/0x32
> [ 278.160261] [<c0266e0c>] idetape_chrdev_release+0x17f/0x18e
> [ 278.160269] [<c016c4f5>] __fput+0xca/0x175
> [ 278.160275] [<c016c5b9>] fput+0x19/0x1b
> [ 278.160280] [<c0169d19>] filp_close+0x51/0x5b
> [ 278.160286] [<c0169d96>] sys_close+0x73/0xad
> [ 278.160293] [<c0102a61>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [ 278.160298] ---[ end trace f16d907ea1f89336 ]---
>
> Instead of trivially fixing it by adding the missing call,
> ide_tape_chrdev_get() and ide_tape_get() were merged into one function
> since both were almost identical. The only difference was that
> ide_tape_chrdev_get() was accessing the ide-tape reference through the
> idetape_devs[] array of minors instead of through the gendisk.
>
> Accomodate that by adding two additional parameters to ide_tape_get() to
> annotate the call site and invoke the proper behavior.
>
> As a result, remove ide_tape_chrdev_get().
>
> There should be no functional change resulting from this patch.
Doesn't it fix the warning? :)
[ I removed this line while merging the patch. ]
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
applied
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists