linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] printk: add halt_delay parameter for printk delay in halt phase

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090608150743.f2a0e09f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:07:43 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	hidave.darkstar@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] printk: add halt_delay parameter for printk delay in
 halt phase

On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:02:53 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> The /proc thing definitely makes sense - the boot option was just 
> symmetry to the existing boot-delay approach.

ok.  btw, if we do decide to go with a general printk_delay then we'll
need a touch_nmi_watchdog() in there to keep the NMI watchdog and
softlockup detector away.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/