[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090608234830.GA27843@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:48:30 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Zick" <lkml@...ethan.org>
Cc: Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: Enable acpi-cpufreq driver for
VIA/Centaur CPUs
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:15:22PM -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> Phooey, close but no cigar - - -
>
> root@...1:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# cat scaling_available_frequencies
> 1200000 1000000 800000 600000 400000
> root@...1:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# cat stats/time_in_state
> 1200000 3281
> 1000000 120
> 800000 130
> 600000 234
> 400000 52980
> root@...1:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq
>
> It loads, it appears to work, but that lowest 400Mhz has ACPI entries
> even though this is a 600Mhz..1200Mhz chip.
If the BIOS tables claim it then it's likely Windows uses it on the same
hardware. What's the stability like with the ACPI code?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists