lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090609065350.GB16707@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 08:53:50 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: extensible perf_counter_attr


* Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> wrote:

> Peter Zijlstra writes:
> 
> > Allow extending the perf_counter_attr structure by linking extended
> > structures to it.
> 
> ...
> 
> > @@ -175,6 +175,13 @@ struct perf_counter_attr {
> >  	__u32			__reserved_3;
> >  
> >  	__u64			__reserved_4;
> > +
> > +	struct perf_counter_attr_ext *ext_attrs;
> > +};
> 
> Since this is a user-visible structure, you've just introduced an 
> ABI difference between 32-bit and 64-bit processes, which we've 
> managed to avoid so far. [...]

This is a good point too - handling pointers in ABIs is possible but 
should be avoided as much as possible: it creates the need to 
introduce a compat_sys_perf_counter_open() and doubles the syscall 
table complexity.

Lets do the s/__reserved_1/attr_size ABI i suggested (i outlined 
various properties of it in the previous mail). Agreed?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ