[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090609111114.2e879a50.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:11:14 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the nilfs tree
Hi Al,
Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflicts in
fs/nilfs2/super.c between commits from the nilfs tree and similar commits
from the vfs tree.
The vfs and nilfs trees have different versions of the following patches:
nilfs2: get rid of sget use for checking if current mount is present
nilfs2: simplify remaining sget() use
nilfs2: correct exclusion control in nilfs_remount function
And the vfs tree has further commits that affect this files as well.
For now, I have used the vfs tree version. Please sort this out.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists