[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020906090050y351e3e9cmb69a089e1a996cd4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:50:28 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Mel Gorman<mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
> In addition, include how many objects there are per-slab and include what
> the order is being passed to the page allocator when allocating new slabs.
> Would that be enough to determine if fallback-to-smaller orders occured?
Well, if the slab_out_of_memory() is called, we already know the
higher order allocation failed _and_ the fallback allocation failed.
So yes, it would be enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists