[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090609081431.GA25316@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:14:31 +0800
From: Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com>
To: "Michael S. Zick" <lkml@...ethan.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.30-rc8 [also: VIA Support]
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 07:17:44AM -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> The mainstream kernel, e_powersaver, is *under-clocking* my machine -
>
> The cpuid instruction provides the minimum and maximum GSF values
> (Guaranteed Stable Frequency) for that processor mask run -
> Passing that on as the lower and upper limits to e_powersaver should
> stop that problem. Will be testing this RSN.
Can you provide more information on where you think you are getting the GSF
values from? I am not aware of such information.
The internal documentation always only refres to the minimum VID/FID values
from the MSR. Also, according to the specifications of all C7 models listed,
there are some that require a minimum of 400MHz, others require a minimum of
800. I have not found any that would require a minimum of 600MHz.
So I don't really know if your system really operates outside any specified
range.
The only thing I know of that you can read from the CPUID vendor string is
the maximum clock frequency in ASCII.
So it seems, e_powersaver is not really at all as dangerous as it appeared!
--
- Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com> http://linux.via.com.tw/
============================================================================
VIA Free and Open Source Software Liaison
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists