[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090609095507.GA9851@attica.americas.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 04:55:07 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] zone_reclaim is always 0 by default
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:50:48PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
Let me start by saying I agree completely with everything you wrote and
still disagree with this patch, but was willing to compromise and work
around this for our upcoming x86_64 machine by putting a "value add"
into our packaging of adding a sysctl that turns reclaim back on.
...
> > Index: b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@ struct device_node;
> >
> > #include <asm/mmzone.h>
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Distance above which we begin to use zone reclaim
> > + */
> > +#define RECLAIM_DISTANCE 20
> > +
> > +
>
> Where is the ia-64-specific modifier to RECAIM_DISTANCE?
It was already defined as 15 in arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h
Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists