2.6.29-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

commit 1eb5ac6466d4be7b15b38ce3ab709600f1bc891f upstream.

SLUB does not correctly account reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab, so it will
break memory reclaim. Account it like SLAB does.

Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
 mm/slub.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/swap.h> /* struct reclaim_state */
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
@@ -1175,6 +1176,8 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cach
 
 	__ClearPageSlab(page);
 	reset_page_mapcount(page);
+	if (current->reclaim_state)
+		current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += pages;
 	__free_pages(page, order);
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/