linux-kernel - Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] fix wrong lru rotate back at lumpty reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28c262360906090430p21125c51g10cfdc377a78d07b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:30:00 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] fix wrong lru rotate back at lumpty reclaim

2009/6/9 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>:
>
> Minchan Kim wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM, KAMEZAWA
>> Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>>>
>>> In lumpty reclaim, "cursor_page" is found just by pfn. Then, we don't
>>> know
>>> from which LRU "cursor" page came from. Then, putback it to "src" list
>>> is BUG.
>>> Just leave it as it is.
>>> (And I think rotate here is overkilling even if "src" is correct.)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/vmscan.c | 5 ++---
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Index: mmotm-2.6.30-Jun4/mm/vmscan.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- mmotm-2.6.30-Jun4.orig/mm/vmscan.c
>>> +++ mmotm-2.6.30-Jun4/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -940,10 +940,9 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(u
>>> nr_taken++;
>>> scan++;
>>> break;
>>> -
>>>case -EBUSY:
>>
>> We can remove case -EBUSY itself, too.
>> It is meaningless.
>>
> Sure, will post v2 and remove EBUSY case.
> (I'm sorry my webmail system converts a space to a multibyte char...
>  then I cut some.)
>
>>> - /* else it is being freed
>>> elsewhere */
>>> -
>>> list_move(&cursor_page->lru, src);
>>> +  /* Do nothing because we
>>> don't know where
>>> + cusrsor_page comes
>>> from */
>>>default:
>>> break; /* ! on LRU or
>>> wrong list */
>>
>> Hmm.. what meaning of this break ?
>> We are in switch case.
>> This "break" can't go out of loop.
> yes.
>
>> But comment said "abort this block scan".
>>
> Where ? the comment says the cursor_page is not on lru (PG_lru is unset)

I mean follow as
 908         /*
 909          * Attempt to take all pages in the order aligned region
 910          * surrounding the tag page.  Only take those pages of
 911          * the same active state as that tag page.  We may safely
 912          * round the target page pfn down to the requested order
 913          * as the mem_map is guarenteed valid out to MAX_ORDER,
 914          * where that page is in a different zone we will detect
 915          * it from its zone id and abort this block scan.
 916          */
 917         zone_id = page_zone_id(page);


>> If I understand it properly , don't we add goto phrase ?
>>
> No.

If it is so, the break also is meaningless.

> Just try next page on list.
>
> Thank you for review, I'll post updated one tomorrow.
> -Kame
>
>



-- 
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/