linux-kernel - [PATCH -tip] perf_counter/x86: Correct some event and umask values for Intel processors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090609131553.GA12489@ywang-moblin2.bj.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:15:53 +0800
From:	Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter/x86: Correct some event and umask values
	for Intel processors

Correct some event and UMASK values according to Intel SDM.

Signed-off-by: Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@...el.com>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
index 56001fe..40978aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static const u64 nehalem_hw_cache_event_ids
  },
  [ C(L1I ) ] = {
 	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
-		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0480, /* L1I.READS                    */
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0380, /* L1I.READS                    */
 		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0280, /* L1I.MISSES                   */
 	},
 	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static const u64 nehalem_hw_cache_event_ids
  [ C(ITLB) ] = {
 	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
 		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x01c0, /* INST_RETIRED.ANY_P           */
-		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0185, /* ITLB_MISS_RETIRED            */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x20c8, /* ITLB_MISS_RETIRED            */
 	},
 	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
 		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static const u64 atom_hw_cache_event_ids
 		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0,
 	},
 	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
-		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x2241, /* L1D_CACHE.ST               */
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x2240, /* L1D_CACHE.ST               */
 		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0,
 	},
 	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
@@ -301,8 +301,8 @@ static const u64 atom_hw_cache_event_ids
  },
  [ C(L1I ) ] = {
 	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
-		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0080, /* L1I.READS                  */
-		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0081, /* L1I.MISSES                 */
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0380, /* L1I.READS                  */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0280, /* L1I.MISSES                 */
 	},
 	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
 		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
@@ -329,11 +329,11 @@ static const u64 atom_hw_cache_event_ids
  },
  [ C(DTLB) ] = {
 	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
-		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0f40, /* L1D_CACHE_LD.MESI  (alias) */
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x2140, /* L1D_CACHE_LD.MESI  (alias) */
 		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0508, /* DTLB_MISSES.MISS_LD        */
 	},
 	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
-		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0f41, /* L1D_CACHE_ST.MESI  (alias) */
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x2240, /* L1D_CACHE_ST.MESI  (alias) */
 		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0608, /* DTLB_MISSES.MISS_ST        */
 	},
 	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/