| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2375c9f90906081743p77934f47n8ba1a018d333b95b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 08:43:34 +0800 From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> To: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> Subject: Re: /proc/kcore has a unreasonable size(281474974617600) in x86_64 2.6.30-rc8. On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Tao Ma<tao.ma@...cle.com> wrote: >>> >>> But the result is the same >> >> Yes? >> Your printk() shows kcore size is: 5301604352, and in your subject it is >> 281474974617600... >> >> Or they happened in the same time? > > yes. the same box and the same linux version. > A bit strange. > > [taoma@...s2-test2 ~]$ dmesg|grep "high memory" > high memory ffff88013c000000, size 5301604352 > [taoma@...s2-test2 ~]$ ll /proc/kcore > -r-------- 1 root root 281474974617600 Jun 8 15:20 /proc/kcore Really weird... They should be the same. This means we have some problem in our procfs. And, we have no problem on i386, I, myself, even can't reproduce this on my x86_64 box... Drop Cc to x86 people, add some Cc to proc people. :) Eric, Alexey, any ideas? Tao, would you like to send us your .config? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists