linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: voyager tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090610020604.fb2b47f3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:06:04 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: voyager tree build failure

Hi James,

On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:18:38 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for finding this.  The fix looks to be a dummy definition of this
> function for x86_64.  The final fix (which has been under discussion)
> will be the elimination of safe_smp_processor_id() altogether.
> 
> I've merged this into the
> 
> [VOYAGER] x86: add {safe,hard}_smp_processor_id to smp_ops
> 
> patch and respun the tree (and built it with an x86-64 cross compiler),
> so it should be safe to include next time around

Thanks.  We will see how we do (later) in the morning.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped