lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A2EAD2F.5010505@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:42:55 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13116] Can't boot with nosmp

Stephen Hemminger wrote:

  

>> This only affects reboots.  But yes, the cpumask code has bugs.  Does 
>> the .config involved select MAXSMP?
>>
>>     
>
> Patch does not fix the problem. Not sure if it is KVM only problem.
> Look like possible cpumask always equals what ACPI / SMP tables report.
> So currently looking into alloc_percpu which may not handle the possible
> but never used cpus.
>
>   

Right, it shouldn't have.

> It is x86-64 config and does not have MAXSMP set. It does have NR_CPUS set.
>   

So it's not cpumask.  Dare I suggest a bisect?

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ