linux-kernel - Re: 3com 3crxjk10075 with ath5k driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b6c5339f0906091339j3784c36bxe888af16272fbcde@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:39:12 -0400
From:	Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>
To:	William Thompson <wt@...ctro-mechanical.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ath5k-devel <ath5k-devel@...ts.ath5k.org>
Subject: Re: 3com 3crxjk10075 with ath5k driver

[CCed ath5k-devel]

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:51 PM, William
Thompson<wt@...ctro-mechanical.com> wrote:
> This card has the "xjack" antennae which is supposed to disable the radio (I
> thought it was in hardware, but it's not) when it is not extended.  The
> madwifi driver (Last time I actually used this card with it) did disable the
> radio (Or refused packets, not sure which).

Huh, I wonder how that works.  Is disabling the radio an advertised feature?
i.e. as opposed to just not working because the antenna is in?

> The kernel ath5k driver (last tested 2.6.29.4) will work regardless if the
> antannae is in or out.

I suppose it could be asserting something on rfkill gpios; ath5k hasn't had
real rfkill support yet.  Anyone else know about these devices?

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/