lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090609140239.260428eb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:02:39 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	baruch@...s.co.il
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: driver for PrimeCell PL061 GPIO controller

On Sun,  7 Jun 2009 21:38:55 +0300
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> wrote:

> This is a driver for the ARM PrimeCell PL061 GPIO AMBA peripheral. The driver
> is implemented using the gpiolib framework.
> 
> This driver also includes support for the use of the PL061 as an interrupt
> controller (secondary).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> 	- Depend on CONFIG_ARM_AMBA
> 	- Do not request the gpio for IRQ automatically, just warn if it's not 
> 	  requested
> 	- Remove SZ_4K
> 	- Iterate through a linked list find the source of interrupt when 
> 	  multiple PL061s are connected to the same IRQ trigger
> 	- Move hardware register defines into the .c file

I generated an incremental diff so that we can see what you did.


>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig       |    1 
>  drivers/gpio/pl061.c       |   92 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  include/linux/amba/pl061.h |   19 +++----
>  3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN drivers/gpio/Kconfig~gpio-driver-for-primecell-pl061-gpio-controller-v4 drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig~gpio-driver-for-primecell-pl061-gpio-controller-v4
> +++ a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ comment "Memory mapped GPIO expanders:"
>  
>  config GPIO_PL061
>  	bool "PrimeCell PL061 GPIO support"
> +	depends on ARM_AMBA
>  	help
>  	  Say yes here to support the PrimeCell PL061 GPIO device
>  
> diff -puN drivers/gpio/pl061.c~gpio-driver-for-primecell-pl061-gpio-controller-v4 drivers/gpio/pl061.c
> --- a/drivers/gpio/pl061.c~gpio-driver-for-primecell-pl061-gpio-controller-v4
> +++ a/drivers/gpio/pl061.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/ioport.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> @@ -24,9 +25,22 @@
>  #include <linux/amba/bus.h>
>  #include <linux/amba/pl061.h>
>  
> +#define GPIODIR 0x400
> +#define GPIOIS  0x404
> +#define GPIOIBE 0x408
> +#define GPIOIEV 0x40C
> +#define GPIOIE  0x410
> +#define GPIORIS 0x414
> +#define GPIOMIS 0x418
> +#define GPIOIC  0x41C
> +
>  #define PL061_GPIO_NR	8
>  
> +#define PL061_REG_SIZE	(4*1024)
> +
>  struct pl061_gpio {
> +	struct list_head	list;

Some commentary which describes this field would be nice.  What lock
protects it, what other list_head this list is anchored to, etc

>  	/* Each of the two spinlocks protects a different set of hardware
>  	 * regiters and data structurs. This decouples the code of the IRQ from
>  	 * the GPIO code. This also makes the case of a GPIO routine call from
> @@ -37,12 +51,8 @@ struct pl061_gpio {
>  
>  	void __iomem		*base;
>  	struct gpio_chip	gc;
> -	struct work_struct	gpio_free_work;
> -	DECLARE_BITMAP(gpios_to_free, PL061_GPIO_NR);
>  };
>  
> -static u32 (*pl061_pending_irq)(int irq);
> -
>  static int pl061_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
>  {
>  	struct pl061_gpio *chip = container_of(gc, struct pl061_gpio, gc);
> @@ -112,16 +122,6 @@ static void pl061_irq_disable(unsigned i
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->irq_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> -static void pl061_irq_shutdown(unsigned irq)
> -{
> -	struct pl061_gpio *chip = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
> -	int offset = irq_to_gpio(irq) - chip->gc.base;
> -
> -	pl061_irq_disable(irq);
> -	set_bit(offset, chip->gpios_to_free);
> -	schedule_work(&chip->gpio_free_work);
> -}
> -
>  static void pl061_irq_enable(unsigned irq)
>  {
>  	struct pl061_gpio *chip = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
> @@ -138,16 +138,10 @@ static void pl061_irq_enable(unsigned ir
>  
>  static unsigned int pl061_irq_startup(unsigned irq)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = gpio_request(irq_to_gpio(irq), "IRQ");
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		pr_warning("%s: warning: gpio_request(%d) returned %d\n",
> -				__func__, irq_to_gpio(irq), ret);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> +	if (gpio_request(irq_to_gpio(irq), "IRQ") == 0)
> +		pr_warning("%s: warning: GPIO%d has not been requested\n",
> +				__func__, irq_to_gpio(irq));

This is wrong, isn't it?  gpio_request() returns 0 on success.

> -	gpio_direction_input(irq_to_gpio(irq));
>  	pl061_irq_enable(irq);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -202,45 +196,38 @@ static struct irq_chip pl061_irqchip = {
>  	.startup	= pl061_irq_startup,
>  	.enable		= pl061_irq_enable,
>  	.disable	= pl061_irq_disable,
> -	.shutdown	= pl061_irq_shutdown,
>  	.set_type	= pl061_irq_type,
>  };
>  
>  static void pl061_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
> +	struct list_head *chip_list = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
> +	struct list_head *ptr;
> +	struct pl061_gpio *chip;
> +
>  	desc->chip->ack(irq);
> -	while (1) {
> +	list_for_each(ptr, chip_list) {

What locking protects the newly-added list?

>  		unsigned long pending;
>  		int gpio;
>  
> -		pending = pl061_pending_irq(irq);
> +		chip = list_entry(ptr, struct pl061_gpio, list);
> +		pending = readb(chip->base + GPIOMIS);
> +		writeb(pending, chip->base + GPIOIC);
> +
>  		if (pending == 0)
> -			break;
> +			continue;
>  
> -		for_each_bit(gpio, &pending, BITS_PER_LONG)
> +		for_each_bit(gpio, &pending, PL061_GPIO_NR)
>  			generic_handle_irq(gpio_to_irq(gpio));
>  	}
>  	desc->chip->unmask(irq);
>  }
>  
> -static void pl061_gpio_free(struct work_struct *work)
> -{
> -	struct pl061_gpio *chip = container_of(work, struct pl061_gpio,
> -			gpio_free_work);
> -	int offset;
> -
> -	for_each_bit(offset, chip->gpios_to_free, PL061_GPIO_NR) {
> -		int gpio = offset + chip->gc.base;
> -
> -		if (test_and_clear_bit(offset, chip->gpios_to_free))
> -			gpio_free(gpio);
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static int __init pl061_probe(struct amba_device *dev, struct amba_id *id)
>  {
>  	struct pl061_platform_data *pdata;
>  	struct pl061_gpio *chip;
> +	struct list_head *chip_list;
>  	int ret, irq, i;
>  
>  	pdata = dev->dev.platform_data;
> @@ -251,12 +238,12 @@ static int __init pl061_probe(struct amb
>  	if (chip == NULL)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	if (request_mem_region(dev->res.start, SZ_4K, "pl061") == NULL) {
> +	if (!request_mem_region(dev->res.start, PL061_REG_SIZE, "pl061")) {
>  		ret = -EBUSY;
>  		goto free_mem;
>  	}
>  
> -	chip->base = ioremap(dev->res.start, SZ_4K);
> +	chip->base = ioremap(dev->res.start, PL061_REG_SIZE);
>  	if (chip->base == NULL) {
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto release_region;
> @@ -264,8 +251,7 @@ static int __init pl061_probe(struct amb
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&chip->lock);
>  	spin_lock_init(&chip->irq_lock);
> -
> -	INIT_WORK(&chip->gpio_free_work, pl061_gpio_free);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chip->list);
>  
>  	chip->gc.direction_input = pl061_direction_input;
>  	chip->gc.direction_output = pl061_direction_output;
> @@ -291,7 +277,17 @@ static int __init pl061_probe(struct amb
>  		goto iounmap;
>  	}
>  	set_irq_chained_handler(irq, pl061_irq_handler);
> -	pl061_pending_irq = pdata->pending_irqs;
> +	if (!pdata->is_irq_initialized || !pdata->is_irq_initialized(irq)) {
> +		chip_list = kmalloc(sizeof(*chip_list), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (chip_list == NULL) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto iounmap;
> +		}
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(chip_list);
> +		set_irq_chip_data(irq, chip_list);
> +	} else
> +		chip_list = get_irq_chip_data(irq);
> +	list_add(&chip->list, chip_list);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < PL061_GPIO_NR; i++) {
>  		if (pdata->directions & (1 << i))
> @@ -312,7 +308,7 @@ static int __init pl061_probe(struct amb
>  iounmap:
>  	iounmap(chip->base);
>  release_region:
> -	release_mem_region(dev->res.start, SZ_4K);
> +	release_mem_region(dev->res.start, PL061_REG_SIZE);
>  free_mem:
>  	kfree(chip);
>  
> diff -puN include/linux/amba/pl061.h~gpio-driver-for-primecell-pl061-gpio-controller-v4 include/linux/amba/pl061.h
> --- a/include/linux/amba/pl061.h~gpio-driver-for-primecell-pl061-gpio-controller-v4
> +++ a/include/linux/amba/pl061.h
> @@ -1,18 +1,17 @@
>  /* platform data for the PL061 GPIO driver */
>  
> -#define GPIODIR 0x400
> -#define GPIOIS  0x404
> -#define GPIOIBE 0x408
> -#define GPIOIEV 0x40C
> -#define GPIOIE  0x410
> -#define GPIORIS 0x414
> -#define GPIOMIS 0x418
> -#define GPIOIC  0x41C
> -
>  struct pl061_platform_data {
>  	/* number of the first GPIO */
>  	unsigned	gpio_base;
> -	u32		(*pending_irqs)(int irq);
> +
>  	u8		directions;	/* startup directions, 1: out, 0: in */
>  	u8		values;		/* startup values */
> +
> +	/* This callback may be used when you have more than one PL061
> +	 * connected to the same IRQ trigger. This callback must return 0 on
> +	 * the first time it is called for each irq, and 1 on any other call.
> +	 * In case you are not unfortunate enough to have this setup, this
> +	 * pointer must be set to NULL.
> +	 */
> +	int		(*is_irq_initialized)(int irq);
>  };
> _
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ