linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm] cpuhotplug: introduce try_get_online

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A2F0517.4020404@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:57:59 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ego@...ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	oleg@...hat.com, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] cpuhotplug: introduce try_get_online_cpus() take
 3

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:07:09 +0800
> Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
>> get_online_cpus() is a typically coarsely granular lock.
>> It's a source of ABBA deadlock.
>>
>> Thanks to the CPU notifiers, Some subsystem's global lock will
>> be required after cpu_hotplug.lock. Subsystem's global lock
>> is coarsely granular lock too, thus a lot's of lock in kernel
>> should be required after cpu_hotplug.lock(if we need
>> cpu_hotplug.lock held too)
>>
>> Otherwise it may come to a ABBA deadlock like this:
>>
>> thread 1                                      |        thread 2
>> _cpu_down()                                   |  Lock a-kernel-lock.
>>   cpu_hotplug_begin()                         |
>>     down_write(&cpu_hotplug.lock)             |
>>   __raw_notifier_call_chain(CPU_DOWN_PREPARE) |  get_online_cpus()
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     Lock a-kernel-lock.(wait thread2)         |    down_read(&cpu_hotplug.lock)
>>                                                    (wait thread 1)
> 
> Confused.  cpu_hotplug_begin() doesn't do
> down_write(&cpu_hotplug.lock).  If it _were_ to do that then yes, we'd
> be vulnerable to the above deadlock.
> 

Ouch, this changelog is modified from the V1. But it not is modified
correctly. I apologize.

Lai.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/