[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090610073749.GA444@console-pimps.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:37:49 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Wolfgang Mües <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de>
Cc: Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc_spi: use EILSEQ for possible transmission errors
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:29:49AM +0200, Wolfgang Mües wrote:
>
> From: Wolfgang Muees <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de>
>
> o This patch changes the reported error code for the responses
> to a command from EINVAL to EFAULT/ENOSYS, as EINVAL is reserved
> for non-recoverable host errors, and the responses from
> the SD/MMC card may be because of recoverable transmission
> errors in the command or in the response. Response codes
> in SPI mode are NOT protected by a checksum, so don't trust them.
>
> This is a revised, minimal-invasive patch version. As Pierre Ossman
> pointed out, EINVAL should only be used for non-recoverable errors
> (and is used so in the whole rest of the mmc framework).
>
> I have checked every instance of EINVAL in the mmc framework - no
> changes were needed here.
>
> This patch is neccessary for doing a sensible retry managment in the
> mmmc block layer (patch will follow).
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Muees <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de>
Nice patch Wolfgang and well done for sticking this out ;-)
FWIW,
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists